Paisagens como infraestruturas midiáticas

Autores

  • Paolo Patelli Universidade de Aarhus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29146/eco-ps.v29i1.28716

Palavras-chave:

sensoriamento ambiental, ecologia da paisagem, observatórios ecológicos, infraestruturas midiáticas, gestão ambiental

Resumo

Tecnologia e ecologia não são conceitos separados: as infraestruturas se comportam como ambientes, enquanto organismos e paisagens atuam como sensores e processadores. Por meio de três casos dinamarqueses — Sistema Integrado de Observação de Carbono (ICOS Sorø), Sistema de Simulação de Animais, Paisagem e Homem (ALMaSS) e Análise e Experimentação em Ecossistemas (AnaEE) —, este ensaio analisa a observação, a simulação e a manipulação como modos pelos quais as paisagens se tornam infraestruturas midiáticas, e defende que o ativismo ecológico e a gestão ambiental devem, por sua vez, assumir um caráter infraestrutural.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Paolo Patelli, Universidade de Aarhus

É pesquisador de pós-doutorado na Universidade de Aarhus, no âmbito do projeto “Design e Estética para Dados Ambientais”, e membro do coletivo de pesquisa e produção Endo, sediado em Copenhague.

Referências

Agersnap, Sune et al. A national scale “BioBlitz” using citizen science and eDNA metabarcoding for monitoring coastal marine fish. Frontiers in Marine Science, v. 9, 2022.

Beloff, Laura et al. (org.). Field_Notes – from landscape to laboratory. Helsinki: Finnish Bioart Society, 2013.

Box, George E. P. Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, v. 71, p. 791–799, 1976.

De Boeck, Hans et al. AnaEE: a European infrastructure for future-oriented experimental ecosystem research. In: EGU General Assembly 2020. 2020.

Drentschew, Maximilian et al. Automated environmental monitoring with remote biological sensors for large areas. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, v. 43, n. 23, p. 89–94, 2010.

Edwards, Paul N. A vast machine: computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2013.

Flanagan, Patricia; Frankjaer, Raune. Rewilding wearables: sympoeitic interfaces for empathic experience of other-than-human entities. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018. p. 611–616.

Gabrys, Jennifer. Ecological observatories: fluctuating sites and sensing subjects. In: Beloff, Laura et al. (org.). Field_Notes – from landscape to laboratory. Helsinki: Finnish Bioart Society, 2013. p. 178–187.

Gabrys, Jennifer. Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.

Hamilton, Michael et al. New approaches in embedded networked sensing for terrestrial ecological observatories. Environmental Engineering Science, v. 24, n. 2, p. 192–204, 2007.

Holm, Rubæk et al. Holistic monitoring of freshwater and terrestrial vertebrates by camera trapping and environmental DNA. bioRxiv (preprint), 2022.

Loukissas, Yanni Alexander. All data are local: thinking critically in a data-driven society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2019.

Lynggaard, Christina et al. Airborne environmental DNA captures terrestrial vertebrate diversity in nature. Molecular Ecology Resources, v. 24, n. 1, 2024.

Mayton, Brian et al. The networked sensory landscape: capturing and experiencing ecological change across scales. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, v. 26, n. 2, p. 182–209, 2017.

Mirzoeff, Nicholas. Visualizing the Anthropocene. Public Culture, v. 26, n. 2, p. 213–232, 2014.

Offenhuber, Dietmar. Autographic design: the matter of data in a self-inscribing world. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2024.

Parikka, Jussi. Medianatures. Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung, v. 9, n. 1, p. 103–106, 2018.

Patelli, Paolo; Parikka, Jussi. Model ecologies—on disassembling and reassembling landscapes. In: M’Closkey, Karen; Vandersys, Keith (org.). Media matters in landscape architecture. San Francisco: Applied Research and Design Publishing (AR+D), 2025.

Pilegaard, Kim; Ibrom, Andreas. Net carbon ecosystem exchange during 24 years in the Sorø beech forest – relations to phenology and climate. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, v. 72, n. 1, 2020.

Roy, Jacques et al. Ecotrons: powerful and versatile ecosystem analysers for ecology, agronomy and environmental science. Global Change Biology, v. 27, n. 7, p. 1387–1407, 2021.

Topping, C. J. The Animal Landscape and Man Simulation System (ALMaSS): a history, design, and philosophy. Research Ideas and Outcomes, v. 8, 2022.

Topping, C. J. et al. ALMaSS, an agent-based model for animals in temperate European landscapes. Ecological Modelling, v. 167, n. 1, p. 65–82, 2003.

Zeuss, Dirk et al. Nature 4.0: a networked sensor system for integrated biodiversity monitoring. Global Change Biology, v. 30, n. 1, 2024.

Downloads

Publicado

22-08-2026

Como Citar

Patelli, P. (2026). Paisagens como infraestruturas midiáticas . Revista Eco-Pós, 29(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.29146/eco-ps.v29i1.28716